Log off/Climb on!

“The true scarce commodity is increasingly human attention”. This idea sounds pretty innocuous.  It can be interpreted in an abundance of ways, both optimistically (attention span isn’t infinite so use it wisely) and pessimistically (our attention span is barely serviceable, we are no different than a louse).  The scariest understanding of that quote is the one understood realistically.

Ten years ago in 2014, Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft made this announcement in a memo.  According to a Microsoft Canada study, average human attention has dropped from 12 seconds to 8 seconds since 2000.  Tech companies are vying for this precious resource in what is now referred to as the Attention Economy.  An economy in which these 8 seconds have become the gold standard of the digital era.

Companies vying for attention is nothing new.  Dog and pony shows of the ancient world were well aware that nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd.  Sears and Roebuck sent out their first full catalogue in 1891, complete with photos, descriptions, and a visible phone number.  Newspapers and magazines put the lead on the front page for a reason.  Colorful uniforms, cheerleaders, dance routines, catchy music, and attractive people have been used to capture the limited attention span of humans since before the written word.

While the goal of capturing your attention hasn’t changed, the means by which companies capture those precious 8-12 seconds has been supercharged beyond anything imaginable.

The job of social media companies is to keep people engaged, but even in the early days of social media apps, whistle blowers were already warning of potential problems.  Potential problems aside, social networks had a focused goal: Optimize how many users could be drawn in, and how long they can remain engaged.  In 2012 YouTube set a watch-time goal of a billion daily hours.  It took four years, the advent of cloud computing, deep learning AI, a rage-loop echo chamber, and countless other factors both contrived and accidental, but a billion hours a day has been the norm ever since.

Of course, it isn’t only YouTube.  Since they set their billion-hour daily goal, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and all other social network apps have followed suit.

These are social networking companies in a capitalist, commerce driven world.  The goal is to make money.  Their motives aren’t unique or blameworthy, but the acts by which they achieve those money driven ends are questionable, and consequences stemming from these acts are discouraging and alarming at best.

It was no secret in the early days of social networks that rage inducing content could maximize time on site, and with a few technological breakthroughs rage would become all the rage. 

Algorithms were designed for topical affinity, and companies were designed to keep people engaged.  What starts off as a cursory glance at kitten videos, slowly yet intentionally slides into a rabbit hole of indignation extracting information and misinformation.  From anti-vaxxers to Trump supporters, cancel culture to border control, it didn’t matter what side you were on, the goal is always one more click, and the systems are designed to keep us engaged.  One billion hours a day!

From kittens to outrage, from independence to tribalism.  Social networks found a way to hijack our time, our attention, and our politics.

Once Deep-Learning AI entered the fray around 2016 it was all over but the shouting!  Deep-learning assumed the job of oversight, and from there it was algorithms improving algorithms to hold our attention.  Users are unknowingly involved in a bidirectional relationship, where deep-learning models learn our behavior based on scrolling, clicks, and likes.  From there they can offer more content to scroll, click, and like, which gives the machines more information about our behavior leading to more scrolls, clicks, and likes.  This has led to 70% of time on site (for YouTube) being the result of algorithm run recommendations.

“You may not realize it, but your experiences are being powered by AI.  If Facebook wanted billions of users to do more or less of something – clicking, liking, commenting – all their company had to do was ask their system to make it happen.”1

With attention-capital at an all-time high, social network executives seem to share a similar refrain. 

“Over the long run more and more people will use Facebook, they’ll spend more and more time on it and that will be good for them, it will be good for Facebook, and it will be good for publishers”2

You can find similar quotes from executives at Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, and nearly every other social network in existence.

From raised levels of isolation and loneliness, to the well documented Russian manipulation of elections, Oregonians banning fluoride, Brazilians rolling back Zika protections, social unrest and violence in Sri Lanka, and an outright genocide in Myanmar, social media users have grown meaner, angrier, and more entitled.3 Results like these don’t sound too good for us, but hey, at least it’s good for Facebook!

Microsoft once launched an AI run Twitter account called Tay.  Tay’s goal was to “converse convincingly with humans by learning from each exchange”.4 It took 96,000 interactions for Microsoft to pull the plug.  On day one, Tay wrote “can i just say that im stoked to meet u?  humans are super cool”. By the end of the day, Tay had tweeted “Hitler was right I hate the Jews”.  Within a day Tay, a learning algorithm had become a Trump supporting neo-Nazi.  That doesn’t sound good, but hey, at least it’s good for Twitter.

We’re consuming the exact same media diet that was fed to Tay, 70% of which is served hot and fresh from attention seeking algorithms.

In 2016 social media companies let learning algorithms (something they did not fully understand) loose on billions of unsuspecting people.  These algorithms took full control of the attention economy, and business is booming.  A billion hours a day on YouTube alone.  A billion daily hours is almost impossible to comprehend, but a billion was only a superficial goal.  The underlying goal is permanent growth of users, time, and attention, the underlying goal is complete authority over human activity.

It’s impossible to outsmart or outrun a learning algorithm trained on your personal interactions, and there is only one way to fight back. 

Log off! 

The once simple deed of powering down, shutting off, or unsubscribing has become an act of revolt, and those who delete or minimize their use of social media are revolutionaries!

And so, in an age where our time is bought, hijacked, and stolen before it’s then sold to the highest bidder, I say we start a revolution.  A revolution where something as simple as the act of climbing is considered rebellious!

Climb ON!!!

Carrot
  1. Fisher, Max. The Chaos Machine: The inside story of how social media rewired our minds and our world. London: Quercus, 2023.
  2. Ibid.
  3. Ibid.
  4. Ibid.

15 Replies to “Log off/Climb on!”

  1. K.L. Hale's avatar

    Thank you, Carrot!! There are too many great lines to quote ~I have whiplash from nodding. Since I’m a fall risk, I’ll cheer you on from a “bit” off the ground.
    I discontinued FB and IG to just be “here”.
    My addiction to living the present, in nature preferably, is greater than my addiction to technology~I turn it off after a set time.
    Thank you for an excellent piece!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. thedihedral's avatar

      This is such an uplifting comment. I was a little afraid that responses would be negative, so thank you for the encouragement! Addiction to living in the present, in nature is ideal!

      Thank you!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. K.L. Hale's avatar

        It’s my pleasure!
        I often think of this very topic and have similar thoughts~and evidence proves my thinking not too far off (a miracle lol)!
        You have a wonderful way with words~it is so well-written!

        Like

    1. thedihedral's avatar

      It feels kind of off posting and promoting a piece about turning off social media on social media, but hopefully the point trumps the medium. Enjoy the bike ride!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. sunyamar's avatar

    Great piece. Now to begin the begin as my Dad always said & REM did a son titled this. One step @ a time. Just deleted a Michael Moore account on Substack so hard to do but I did “Begin the Begin” Thank you again.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Martha Kennedy's avatar

    I’d punctuate this differently, I think, “The true scarce commodity is, increasingly, human attention”

    This has been on my mind for a while (as I type my response on a social media platform). Authentic human interaction is so different from what we do online, but the online experience has changed what could be authentic human interaction into something else. I’d have to write an essay that I don’t want to write to explain what I mean, but…

    It’s Sandhill Crane season out at my Refuge. The Cranes have a miraculous effect on the people who come to see them. The cranes and NOT being plugged in — though a lot of crane tourists are there to get their photos to post on social media. This morning I had one brief moment of authentic human interaction when a truck drove buy Bear and me, and slowed down a bit. Bear and I stood beside the road. The passenger rolled down his window, smiled at us (I smiled at them) and said “Good morning!” Such a small thing but REAL. It feels completely different and I love it.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. thedihedral's avatar

      I have been wondering lately how someone like Shakespeare would do in today’s world. I tend to think Shakespeare is an actual genius, but I’m not so sure he’d even be noticed in today’s iteration of the human experience? All this is to say that artists who portray human interaction comically or dramatically or whatever might struggle to find life they would be interested in imitating through their works. In short, the online experience lacks the richness of a full bodied life, and boring lives lead to boring art.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Martha Kennedy's avatar

        Some of his plays were something like 4 hours long or more?

        One thing I’ve noticed reading all these books for the contest is the uniformity of experience in some of them. People DO believe what they’re told and social media — maybe because of the shortened attention span necessary to “get” an “idea” makes brainwashing easy and reinforces superficiality as a social virtue. People don’t question things in ways I think they might have 20 or 30 years ago. “Bread and circuses”.

        I want to get it out of my life, but so far I have failed. Maybe I should give it another shot…

        Liked by 1 person

      2. thedihedral's avatar

        I hope that as we get into the era of prompt engineering as a career, the best unintended consequence is that people learn to ask better questions. AI responses will only be as good as the questions allow. Maybe that will help some to raise and pose questions in ways that encourage more thought? Perhaps I’m being overly optimistic?

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Martha Kennedy's avatar

        My post today is about optimism. I actually thought of you while I was writing it… Personally, I don’t see any point in being otherwise.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. thedihedral's avatar

        That is just what I needed. Just gave back the first exam to my intro students, it has to have been the worst class average I’ve ever seen. I need to re-read your piece before the next exam just in case!

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to K.L. Hale Cancel reply